[CRIU] [PATCHv1 04/26] sigframe: prepare macro helpers for two sigframes
Laurent Dufour
ldufour at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Jun 16 07:02:52 PDT 2016
On 16/06/2016 15:40, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 04:34 PM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> On 16/06/2016 12:53, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
>>> As on x86 compat/native sigframe differ, I need to generalize/modify
>>> sigframe macro helpers having in mind:
>>> - SIGFRAME_OFFSET differ between native/compat tasks, so it takes
>>> sigframe parameter now, which will be used in following patches
>>> (also renamed it in RT_SIGFRAME_OFFSET to complement other macros)
>>> - RT_SIGFRAME_FPU is now pointer, because each caller takes result's
>>> address with &RT_SIGFRAME_FPU(...)
>>> - sigreturn_prep_fpu_frame now takes rt_sigframe parameter, as
>>> address of fpu_state pointer on x86 will depend on native/compat
>>> frame type, so I check local sigframe's type and count address
>>> for rsigframe. (See in the very next commit).
>>>
>>
>> Hi Dimitry,
>
> Hi Laurent,
>
>> I've trouble applying your series on top of criu-dev (commit
>> 674583f20cb6).
>> I'd like to apply to it and give it a try before stating...
>>
>> Could you rebase it ?
>
> Could you tell what kind of trouble do you have?
> I mean I based it on today criu-dev on the moment of sending,
> and now rebased it on mentioned commit 674583f20cb6 without
> any conflict.
> The same is with criu-patchwork - it applied patches without fails,
> afaics: https://zdtm.openvz.org/series/259/
>
> Thanks for giving it a try :)
The series from patchwork is applied without any conflicts.
Not sure what happened with the one I extracted from the mailing.
I'll review it and give it a try on ppc64le.
Thanks,
Laurent.
More information about the CRIU
mailing list