[CRIU] [PATCH 2/2] inet: set IP_FREEBIND before binding socket to an ipv6 address
Andrew Vagin
avagin at virtuozzo.com
Thu Nov 19 04:38:44 PST 2015
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:33:37PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 06:58 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > From: Andrew Vagin <avagin at virtuozzo.com>
> >
> > When we restore ipv6 addresses, they go through a “tentative” phase
> > and sockets could not be bound to them in this moment.
> >
> > Reported-by: Ross Boucher <boucher at gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin at virtuozzo.com>
> > ---
> > sk-inet.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sk-inet.c b/sk-inet.c
> > index 779a1bd..a973000 100644
> > --- a/sk-inet.c
> > +++ b/sk-inet.c
> > @@ -633,17 +633,29 @@ static int restore_sockaddr(union sockaddr_inet *sa,
> >
> > int inet_bind(int sk, struct inet_sk_info *ii)
> > {
> > + bool rst_freebind = false;
> > union sockaddr_inet addr;
> > int addr_size;
> > - int val;
> >
> > addr_size = restore_sockaddr(&addr, ii->ie->family,
> > ii->ie->src_port, ii->ie->src_addr);
> >
> > - val = 1;
> > - if (setsockopt(sk, SOL_IP, IP_FREEBIND, &val, sizeof(int))) {
> > - pr_perror("Unable to set IP_FREEBIND");
> > - return -1;
> > + /*
> > + * ipv6 addresses go through a “tentative” phase and
> > + * sockets could not be bound to them in this moment
> > + * without setting IP_FREEBIND.
> > + */
> > + if (ii->ie->family == AF_INET6) {
> > + int yes = 1;
> > +
> > + if (restore_opt(sk, SOL_IP, IP_FREEBIND, &yes))
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + if (ii->ie->ip_opts && ii->ie->ip_opts->freebind)
> > + /* don't restore freebind in restore_ip_opts() */
>
> At all? When will it get restored then?
We set the right value here, so we don't need to restore it in
restore_ip_opts()
>
> > + ii->ie->ip_opts->has_freebind = false;
> > + else
> > + rst_freebind = true;
> > }
> >
> > if (bind(sk, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, addr_size) == -1) {
> > @@ -651,6 +663,13 @@ int inet_bind(int sk, struct inet_sk_info *ii)
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > + if (rst_freebind) {
> > + int no = 0;
> > +
> > + if (restore_opt(sk, SOL_IP, IP_FREEBIND, &no))
> > + return -1;
>
> Why here? Why not delay "NO" till actual options restore?
because we restore only "yes", "no" is default.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
>
More information about the CRIU
mailing list