[CRIU] [PATCH] prootbuf: Carry a copy of descriptor.proto
Ruslan Kuprieiev
kupruser at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 07:22:59 PDT 2015
Acked-by: Ruslan Kuprieiev <rkuprieiev at cloudlinux.com>
On 03/24/2015 09:34 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Instead of having hardcoded symlink which points
> to some internal protobuf file (actually this file
> may be set up into some other place and the link
> get broken), lets carry a copy -- this file is part
> of abi so backward compatible.
>
> Otherwise on some machines the build procedure can be
> simply broken, say headers installed into /usr/local
> or something else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at openvz.org>
> ---
> protobuf/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto | 621 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 620 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> mode change 120000 => 100644 protobuf/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto
>
> diff --git a/protobuf/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto b/protobuf/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto
> deleted file mode 120000
> index 07a4c9add618..000000000000
> --- a/protobuf/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1 +0,0 @@
> -/usr/include/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/protobuf/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto b/protobuf/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a785f79faf61
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/protobuf/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto
> @@ -0,0 +1,620 @@
> +// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
> +// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
> +// http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/
> +//
> +// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> +// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
> +// met:
> +//
> +// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> +// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> +// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
> +// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
> +// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> +// distribution.
> +// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
> +// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
> +// this software without specific prior written permission.
> +//
> +// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> +// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> +// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
> +// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
> +// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> +// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> +// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
> +// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
> +// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> +// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> +// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> +
> +// Author: kenton at google.com (Kenton Varda)
> +// Based on original Protocol Buffers design by
> +// Sanjay Ghemawat, Jeff Dean, and others.
> +//
> +// The messages in this file describe the definitions found in .proto files.
> +// A valid .proto file can be translated directly to a FileDescriptorProto
> +// without any other information (e.g. without reading its imports).
> +
> +
> +
> +package google.protobuf;
> +option java_package = "com.google.protobuf";
> +option java_outer_classname = "DescriptorProtos";
> +
> +// descriptor.proto must be optimized for speed because reflection-based
> +// algorithms don't work during bootstrapping.
> +option optimize_for = SPEED;
> +
> +// The protocol compiler can output a FileDescriptorSet containing the .proto
> +// files it parses.
> +message FileDescriptorSet {
> + repeated FileDescriptorProto file = 1;
> +}
> +
> +// Describes a complete .proto file.
> +message FileDescriptorProto {
> + optional string name = 1; // file name, relative to root of source tree
> + optional string package = 2; // e.g. "foo", "foo.bar", etc.
> +
> + // Names of files imported by this file.
> + repeated string dependency = 3;
> + // Indexes of the public imported files in the dependency list above.
> + repeated int32 public_dependency = 10;
> + // Indexes of the weak imported files in the dependency list.
> + // For Google-internal migration only. Do not use.
> + repeated int32 weak_dependency = 11;
> +
> + // All top-level definitions in this file.
> + repeated DescriptorProto message_type = 4;
> + repeated EnumDescriptorProto enum_type = 5;
> + repeated ServiceDescriptorProto service = 6;
> + repeated FieldDescriptorProto extension = 7;
> +
> + optional FileOptions options = 8;
> +
> + // This field contains optional information about the original source code.
> + // You may safely remove this entire field whithout harming runtime
> + // functionality of the descriptors -- the information is needed only by
> + // development tools.
> + optional SourceCodeInfo source_code_info = 9;
> +}
> +
> +// Describes a message type.
> +message DescriptorProto {
> + optional string name = 1;
> +
> + repeated FieldDescriptorProto field = 2;
> + repeated FieldDescriptorProto extension = 6;
> +
> + repeated DescriptorProto nested_type = 3;
> + repeated EnumDescriptorProto enum_type = 4;
> +
> + message ExtensionRange {
> + optional int32 start = 1;
> + optional int32 end = 2;
> + }
> + repeated ExtensionRange extension_range = 5;
> +
> + optional MessageOptions options = 7;
> +}
> +
> +// Describes a field within a message.
> +message FieldDescriptorProto {
> + enum Type {
> + // 0 is reserved for errors.
> + // Order is weird for historical reasons.
> + TYPE_DOUBLE = 1;
> + TYPE_FLOAT = 2;
> + // Not ZigZag encoded. Negative numbers take 10 bytes. Use TYPE_SINT64 if
> + // negative values are likely.
> + TYPE_INT64 = 3;
> + TYPE_UINT64 = 4;
> + // Not ZigZag encoded. Negative numbers take 10 bytes. Use TYPE_SINT32 if
> + // negative values are likely.
> + TYPE_INT32 = 5;
> + TYPE_FIXED64 = 6;
> + TYPE_FIXED32 = 7;
> + TYPE_BOOL = 8;
> + TYPE_STRING = 9;
> + TYPE_GROUP = 10; // Tag-delimited aggregate.
> + TYPE_MESSAGE = 11; // Length-delimited aggregate.
> +
> + // New in version 2.
> + TYPE_BYTES = 12;
> + TYPE_UINT32 = 13;
> + TYPE_ENUM = 14;
> + TYPE_SFIXED32 = 15;
> + TYPE_SFIXED64 = 16;
> + TYPE_SINT32 = 17; // Uses ZigZag encoding.
> + TYPE_SINT64 = 18; // Uses ZigZag encoding.
> + };
> +
> + enum Label {
> + // 0 is reserved for errors
> + LABEL_OPTIONAL = 1;
> + LABEL_REQUIRED = 2;
> + LABEL_REPEATED = 3;
> + // TODO(sanjay): Should we add LABEL_MAP?
> + };
> +
> + optional string name = 1;
> + optional int32 number = 3;
> + optional Label label = 4;
> +
> + // If type_name is set, this need not be set. If both this and type_name
> + // are set, this must be either TYPE_ENUM or TYPE_MESSAGE.
> + optional Type type = 5;
> +
> + // For message and enum types, this is the name of the type. If the name
> + // starts with a '.', it is fully-qualified. Otherwise, C++-like scoping
> + // rules are used to find the type (i.e. first the nested types within this
> + // message are searched, then within the parent, on up to the root
> + // namespace).
> + optional string type_name = 6;
> +
> + // For extensions, this is the name of the type being extended. It is
> + // resolved in the same manner as type_name.
> + optional string extendee = 2;
> +
> + // For numeric types, contains the original text representation of the value.
> + // For booleans, "true" or "false".
> + // For strings, contains the default text contents (not escaped in any way).
> + // For bytes, contains the C escaped value. All bytes >= 128 are escaped.
> + // TODO(kenton): Base-64 encode?
> + optional string default_value = 7;
> +
> + optional FieldOptions options = 8;
> +}
> +
> +// Describes an enum type.
> +message EnumDescriptorProto {
> + optional string name = 1;
> +
> + repeated EnumValueDescriptorProto value = 2;
> +
> + optional EnumOptions options = 3;
> +}
> +
> +// Describes a value within an enum.
> +message EnumValueDescriptorProto {
> + optional string name = 1;
> + optional int32 number = 2;
> +
> + optional EnumValueOptions options = 3;
> +}
> +
> +// Describes a service.
> +message ServiceDescriptorProto {
> + optional string name = 1;
> + repeated MethodDescriptorProto method = 2;
> +
> + optional ServiceOptions options = 3;
> +}
> +
> +// Describes a method of a service.
> +message MethodDescriptorProto {
> + optional string name = 1;
> +
> + // Input and output type names. These are resolved in the same way as
> + // FieldDescriptorProto.type_name, but must refer to a message type.
> + optional string input_type = 2;
> + optional string output_type = 3;
> +
> + optional MethodOptions options = 4;
> +}
> +
> +
> +// ===================================================================
> +// Options
> +
> +// Each of the definitions above may have "options" attached. These are
> +// just annotations which may cause code to be generated slightly differently
> +// or may contain hints for code that manipulates protocol messages.
> +//
> +// Clients may define custom options as extensions of the *Options messages.
> +// These extensions may not yet be known at parsing time, so the parser cannot
> +// store the values in them. Instead it stores them in a field in the *Options
> +// message called uninterpreted_option. This field must have the same name
> +// across all *Options messages. We then use this field to populate the
> +// extensions when we build a descriptor, at which point all protos have been
> +// parsed and so all extensions are known.
> +//
> +// Extension numbers for custom options may be chosen as follows:
> +// * For options which will only be used within a single application or
> +// organization, or for experimental options, use field numbers 50000
> +// through 99999. It is up to you to ensure that you do not use the
> +// same number for multiple options.
> +// * For options which will be published and used publicly by multiple
> +// independent entities, e-mail protobuf-global-extension-registry at google.com
> +// to reserve extension numbers. Simply provide your project name (e.g.
> +// Object-C plugin) and your porject website (if available) -- there's no need
> +// to explain how you intend to use them. Usually you only need one extension
> +// number. You can declare multiple options with only one extension number by
> +// putting them in a sub-message. See the Custom Options section of the docs
> +// for examples:
> +// http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/proto.html#options
> +// If this turns out to be popular, a web service will be set up
> +// to automatically assign option numbers.
> +
> +
> +message FileOptions {
> +
> + // Sets the Java package where classes generated from this .proto will be
> + // placed. By default, the proto package is used, but this is often
> + // inappropriate because proto packages do not normally start with backwards
> + // domain names.
> + optional string java_package = 1;
> +
> +
> + // If set, all the classes from the .proto file are wrapped in a single
> + // outer class with the given name. This applies to both Proto1
> + // (equivalent to the old "--one_java_file" option) and Proto2 (where
> + // a .proto always translates to a single class, but you may want to
> + // explicitly choose the class name).
> + optional string java_outer_classname = 8;
> +
> + // If set true, then the Java code generator will generate a separate .java
> + // file for each top-level message, enum, and service defined in the .proto
> + // file. Thus, these types will *not* be nested inside the outer class
> + // named by java_outer_classname. However, the outer class will still be
> + // generated to contain the file's getDescriptor() method as well as any
> + // top-level extensions defined in the file.
> + optional bool java_multiple_files = 10 [default=false];
> +
> + // If set true, then the Java code generator will generate equals() and
> + // hashCode() methods for all messages defined in the .proto file. This is
> + // purely a speed optimization, as the AbstractMessage base class includes
> + // reflection-based implementations of these methods.
> + optional bool java_generate_equals_and_hash = 20 [default=false];
> +
> + // Generated classes can be optimized for speed or code size.
> + enum OptimizeMode {
> + SPEED = 1; // Generate complete code for parsing, serialization,
> + // etc.
> + CODE_SIZE = 2; // Use ReflectionOps to implement these methods.
> + LITE_RUNTIME = 3; // Generate code using MessageLite and the lite runtime.
> + }
> + optional OptimizeMode optimize_for = 9 [default=SPEED];
> +
> + // Sets the Go package where structs generated from this .proto will be
> + // placed. There is no default.
> + optional string go_package = 11;
> +
> +
> +
> + // Should generic services be generated in each language? "Generic" services
> + // are not specific to any particular RPC system. They are generated by the
> + // main code generators in each language (without additional plugins).
> + // Generic services were the only kind of service generation supported by
> + // early versions of proto2.
> + //
> + // Generic services are now considered deprecated in favor of using plugins
> + // that generate code specific to your particular RPC system. Therefore,
> + // these default to false. Old code which depends on generic services should
> + // explicitly set them to true.
> + optional bool cc_generic_services = 16 [default=false];
> + optional bool java_generic_services = 17 [default=false];
> + optional bool py_generic_services = 18 [default=false];
> +
> + // The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
> + repeated UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
> +
> + // Clients can define custom options in extensions of this message. See above.
> + extensions 1000 to max;
> +}
> +
> +message MessageOptions {
> + // Set true to use the old proto1 MessageSet wire format for extensions.
> + // This is provided for backwards-compatibility with the MessageSet wire
> + // format. You should not use this for any other reason: It's less
> + // efficient, has fewer features, and is more complicated.
> + //
> + // The message must be defined exactly as follows:
> + // message Foo {
> + // option message_set_wire_format = true;
> + // extensions 4 to max;
> + // }
> + // Note that the message cannot have any defined fields; MessageSets only
> + // have extensions.
> + //
> + // All extensions of your type must be singular messages; e.g. they cannot
> + // be int32s, enums, or repeated messages.
> + //
> + // Because this is an option, the above two restrictions are not enforced by
> + // the protocol compiler.
> + optional bool message_set_wire_format = 1 [default=false];
> +
> + // Disables the generation of the standard "descriptor()" accessor, which can
> + // conflict with a field of the same name. This is meant to make migration
> + // from proto1 easier; new code should avoid fields named "descriptor".
> + optional bool no_standard_descriptor_accessor = 2 [default=false];
> +
> + // The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
> + repeated UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
> +
> + // Clients can define custom options in extensions of this message. See above.
> + extensions 1000 to max;
> +}
> +
> +message FieldOptions {
> + // The ctype option instructs the C++ code generator to use a different
> + // representation of the field than it normally would. See the specific
> + // options below. This option is not yet implemented in the open source
> + // release -- sorry, we'll try to include it in a future version!
> + optional CType ctype = 1 [default = STRING];
> + enum CType {
> + // Default mode.
> + STRING = 0;
> +
> + CORD = 1;
> +
> + STRING_PIECE = 2;
> + }
> + // The packed option can be enabled for repeated primitive fields to enable
> + // a more efficient representation on the wire. Rather than repeatedly
> + // writing the tag and type for each element, the entire array is encoded as
> + // a single length-delimited blob.
> + optional bool packed = 2;
> +
> +
> +
> + // Should this field be parsed lazily? Lazy applies only to message-type
> + // fields. It means that when the outer message is initially parsed, the
> + // inner message's contents will not be parsed but instead stored in encoded
> + // form. The inner message will actually be parsed when it is first accessed.
> + //
> + // This is only a hint. Implementations are free to choose whether to use
> + // eager or lazy parsing regardless of the value of this option. However,
> + // setting this option true suggests that the protocol author believes that
> + // using lazy parsing on this field is worth the additional bookkeeping
> + // overhead typically needed to implement it.
> + //
> + // This option does not affect the public interface of any generated code;
> + // all method signatures remain the same. Furthermore, thread-safety of the
> + // interface is not affected by this option; const methods remain safe to
> + // call from multiple threads concurrently, while non-const methods continue
> + // to require exclusive access.
> + //
> + //
> + // Note that implementations may choose not to check required fields within
> + // a lazy sub-message. That is, calling IsInitialized() on the outher message
> + // may return true even if the inner message has missing required fields.
> + // This is necessary because otherwise the inner message would have to be
> + // parsed in order to perform the check, defeating the purpose of lazy
> + // parsing. An implementation which chooses not to check required fields
> + // must be consistent about it. That is, for any particular sub-message, the
> + // implementation must either *always* check its required fields, or *never*
> + // check its required fields, regardless of whether or not the message has
> + // been parsed.
> + optional bool lazy = 5 [default=false];
> +
> + // Is this field deprecated?
> + // Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations
> + // for accessors, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this
> + // is a formalization for deprecating fields.
> + optional bool deprecated = 3 [default=false];
> +
> + // EXPERIMENTAL. DO NOT USE.
> + // For "map" fields, the name of the field in the enclosed type that
> + // is the key for this map. For example, suppose we have:
> + // message Item {
> + // required string name = 1;
> + // required string value = 2;
> + // }
> + // message Config {
> + // repeated Item items = 1 [experimental_map_key="name"];
> + // }
> + // In this situation, the map key for Item will be set to "name".
> + // TODO: Fully-implement this, then remove the "experimental_" prefix.
> + optional string experimental_map_key = 9;
> +
> + // For Google-internal migration only. Do not use.
> + optional bool weak = 10 [default=false];
> +
> + // The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
> + repeated UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
> +
> + // Clients can define custom options in extensions of this message. See above.
> + extensions 1000 to max;
> +}
> +
> +message EnumOptions {
> +
> + // Set this option to false to disallow mapping different tag names to a same
> + // value.
> + optional bool allow_alias = 2 [default=true];
> +
> + // The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
> + repeated UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
> +
> + // Clients can define custom options in extensions of this message. See above.
> + extensions 1000 to max;
> +}
> +
> +message EnumValueOptions {
> + // The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
> + repeated UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
> +
> + // Clients can define custom options in extensions of this message. See above.
> + extensions 1000 to max;
> +}
> +
> +message ServiceOptions {
> +
> + // Note: Field numbers 1 through 32 are reserved for Google's internal RPC
> + // framework. We apologize for hoarding these numbers to ourselves, but
> + // we were already using them long before we decided to release Protocol
> + // Buffers.
> +
> + // The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
> + repeated UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
> +
> + // Clients can define custom options in extensions of this message. See above.
> + extensions 1000 to max;
> +}
> +
> +message MethodOptions {
> +
> + // Note: Field numbers 1 through 32 are reserved for Google's internal RPC
> + // framework. We apologize for hoarding these numbers to ourselves, but
> + // we were already using them long before we decided to release Protocol
> + // Buffers.
> +
> + // The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.
> + repeated UninterpretedOption uninterpreted_option = 999;
> +
> + // Clients can define custom options in extensions of this message. See above.
> + extensions 1000 to max;
> +}
> +
> +
> +// A message representing a option the parser does not recognize. This only
> +// appears in options protos created by the compiler::Parser class.
> +// DescriptorPool resolves these when building Descriptor objects. Therefore,
> +// options protos in descriptor objects (e.g. returned by Descriptor::options(),
> +// or produced by Descriptor::CopyTo()) will never have UninterpretedOptions
> +// in them.
> +message UninterpretedOption {
> + // The name of the uninterpreted option. Each string represents a segment in
> + // a dot-separated name. is_extension is true iff a segment represents an
> + // extension (denoted with parentheses in options specs in .proto files).
> + // E.g.,{ ["foo", false], ["bar.baz", true], ["qux", false] } represents
> + // "foo.(bar.baz).qux".
> + message NamePart {
> + required string name_part = 1;
> + required bool is_extension = 2;
> + }
> + repeated NamePart name = 2;
> +
> + // The value of the uninterpreted option, in whatever type the tokenizer
> + // identified it as during parsing. Exactly one of these should be set.
> + optional string identifier_value = 3;
> + optional uint64 positive_int_value = 4;
> + optional int64 negative_int_value = 5;
> + optional double double_value = 6;
> + optional bytes string_value = 7;
> + optional string aggregate_value = 8;
> +}
> +
> +// ===================================================================
> +// Optional source code info
> +
> +// Encapsulates information about the original source file from which a
> +// FileDescriptorProto was generated.
> +message SourceCodeInfo {
> + // A Location identifies a piece of source code in a .proto file which
> + // corresponds to a particular definition. This information is intended
> + // to be useful to IDEs, code indexers, documentation generators, and similar
> + // tools.
> + //
> + // For example, say we have a file like:
> + // message Foo {
> + // optional string foo = 1;
> + // }
> + // Let's look at just the field definition:
> + // optional string foo = 1;
> + // ^ ^^ ^^ ^ ^^^
> + // a bc de f ghi
> + // We have the following locations:
> + // span path represents
> + // [a,i) [ 4, 0, 2, 0 ] The whole field definition.
> + // [a,b) [ 4, 0, 2, 0, 4 ] The label (optional).
> + // [c,d) [ 4, 0, 2, 0, 5 ] The type (string).
> + // [e,f) [ 4, 0, 2, 0, 1 ] The name (foo).
> + // [g,h) [ 4, 0, 2, 0, 3 ] The number (1).
> + //
> + // Notes:
> + // - A location may refer to a repeated field itself (i.e. not to any
> + // particular index within it). This is used whenever a set of elements are
> + // logically enclosed in a single code segment. For example, an entire
> + // extend block (possibly containing multiple extension definitions) will
> + // have an outer location whose path refers to the "extensions" repeated
> + // field without an index.
> + // - Multiple locations may have the same path. This happens when a single
> + // logical declaration is spread out across multiple places. The most
> + // obvious example is the "extend" block again -- there may be multiple
> + // extend blocks in the same scope, each of which will have the same path.
> + // - A location's span is not always a subset of its parent's span. For
> + // example, the "extendee" of an extension declaration appears at the
> + // beginning of the "extend" block and is shared by all extensions within
> + // the block.
> + // - Just because a location's span is a subset of some other location's span
> + // does not mean that it is a descendent. For example, a "group" defines
> + // both a type and a field in a single declaration. Thus, the locations
> + // corresponding to the type and field and their components will overlap.
> + // - Code which tries to interpret locations should probably be designed to
> + // ignore those that it doesn't understand, as more types of locations could
> + // be recorded in the future.
> + repeated Location location = 1;
> + message Location {
> + // Identifies which part of the FileDescriptorProto was defined at this
> + // location.
> + //
> + // Each element is a field number or an index. They form a path from
> + // the root FileDescriptorProto to the place where the definition. For
> + // example, this path:
> + // [ 4, 3, 2, 7, 1 ]
> + // refers to:
> + // file.message_type(3) // 4, 3
> + // .field(7) // 2, 7
> + // .name() // 1
> + // This is because FileDescriptorProto.message_type has field number 4:
> + // repeated DescriptorProto message_type = 4;
> + // and DescriptorProto.field has field number 2:
> + // repeated FieldDescriptorProto field = 2;
> + // and FieldDescriptorProto.name has field number 1:
> + // optional string name = 1;
> + //
> + // Thus, the above path gives the location of a field name. If we removed
> + // the last element:
> + // [ 4, 3, 2, 7 ]
> + // this path refers to the whole field declaration (from the beginning
> + // of the label to the terminating semicolon).
> + repeated int32 path = 1 [packed=true];
> +
> + // Always has exactly three or four elements: start line, start column,
> + // end line (optional, otherwise assumed same as start line), end column.
> + // These are packed into a single field for efficiency. Note that line
> + // and column numbers are zero-based -- typically you will want to add
> + // 1 to each before displaying to a user.
> + repeated int32 span = 2 [packed=true];
> +
> + // If this SourceCodeInfo represents a complete declaration, these are any
> + // comments appearing before and after the declaration which appear to be
> + // attached to the declaration.
> + //
> + // A series of line comments appearing on consecutive lines, with no other
> + // tokens appearing on those lines, will be treated as a single comment.
> + //
> + // Only the comment content is provided; comment markers (e.g. //) are
> + // stripped out. For block comments, leading whitespace and an asterisk
> + // will be stripped from the beginning of each line other than the first.
> + // Newlines are included in the output.
> + //
> + // Examples:
> + //
> + // optional int32 foo = 1; // Comment attached to foo.
> + // // Comment attached to bar.
> + // optional int32 bar = 2;
> + //
> + // optional string baz = 3;
> + // // Comment attached to baz.
> + // // Another line attached to baz.
> + //
> + // // Comment attached to qux.
> + // //
> + // // Another line attached to qux.
> + // optional double qux = 4;
> + //
> + // optional string corge = 5;
> + // /* Block comment attached
> + // * to corge. Leading asterisks
> + // * will be removed. */
> + // /* Block comment attached to
> + // * grault. */
> + // optional int32 grault = 6;
> + optional string leading_comments = 3;
> + optional string trailing_comments = 4;
> + }
> +}
More information about the CRIU
mailing list