[CRIU] Dealing with VDSO remap

[Laurent Dufour]

On 20/03/2015 11:21, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>
>> You're right Cyrill, if the vDSO is mapped back to the address it has at
>> checkpoint time, then the checkpointed stack frame is good. If there is
>> a need for a new vDSO then the proxy would have to handle that.
>>
>> I had to work on this vDSO proxy for ppc64, I put it on the back burner,
>> but it's now time to make it.
> 
> Just curious. the vdso for ppc64 is rip relative as well?

What do you mean by 'rip relative' ?