[CRIU] Dealing with VDSO remap

Laurent Dufour ldufour at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Mar 9 06:34:03 PDT 2015


Hi Chris,

On 06/03/2015 15:58, Christopher Covington wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> 
> On 03/06/2015 09:15 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm porting CRIU to the PopwerPC architecture, and among other issues,
>> I'm facing a major one with the VDSO remapping at restart time.
>>
>> On PowerPC, as on ARM64, the kernel keeps track of the VDSO base address
>> because it is using it to jump back to a sigreturn trampoline at the end
>> of a signal processing (see handle_rt_signal64 in
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c, and for ARM64, setup_return in
>> arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c).
>>
>> When remapping the VDSO at restart time, the kernel keep the reference
>> to the previous VDSO mapping, the one inheriting from the criu, so
>> handling signal after the restart leads to unpredictable results, most
>> of the time a SIGSEGV is raised.
>>
>> I didn't find a smart way to update the kernel reference to the vdso
>> mapping once the VDSO is remapped, so no way to work around that today.
>>
>> Furthermore, since this is the same picture on ARM 64, I'm wondering how
>> it could work on this architecture. Am I missing a major thing here ?
>>
>> If not, is there a plan in the CRIU project to to deal with that, other
>> than by hacking the kernel to update its reference at restart time ?
> 
> It's been a while since I worked on this, and I feel like I never had a really
> solid understanding of all the parts, but hopefully this can help.
> 
> I think the ideal solution would be for a remap system call to move the VDSO.
> This may have been implemented for x86, but I think it's a new feature and
> missing on most other architectures. There's a lot of duplication in the VDSO
> code between architectures. If there was less duplication, the x86 additions
> might easily apply to other architectures as well, but I've never gotten
> around to consolidating the VDSO code and I haven't noticed anyone else having
> gotten around to it either.

I came to the same conclusion, when the VDSO area is remapped, some
architecture specific code should be triggerd in the kernel to update
the VDSO reference.
I'll take a closer look to the mremap in the kernel..

> The workaround is to put trampolines/branches at the location that the
> restored process expects to the location that the VDSO is currently located at
> restore time. See vdso_redirect_calls in arch/aarch64/vdso-pie.c.

I put the same code in the new ppc64 branch I created but it is only
dealing with user space's references to the VDSO, not the kernel ones.

Unfortunately, creating a trampoline at the place the kernel put the
VDSO at restart is not working all the time since this area may conflict
with a checkpointed memory part. Updating the kernel reference to the
VDSO, when it has been moved, looks to be the only way to address that.

Laurent.



More information about the CRIU mailing list