[CRIU] [PATCH] crit: enable --pretty by default

[Andrew Vagin]

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 06:30:00PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> On 07/22/2015 12:48 AM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:28:19PM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
> >> On 07/21/2015 02:32 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:17:20PM +0300, Ruslan Kuprieiev wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 07/21/2015 09:06 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:57:26PM +0300, Ruslan Kuprieiev wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Tycho,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We did that on purpose, as we thought that crit should be used in various
> >>>>>> scripts and they might be not happy with --pretty option, as it does some
> >>>>>> unusual transformations with data(i.e. int to string in hex) which scripts
> >>>>>> might be not happy about, as they use json tools(i.e. they might expect int
> >>>>>> but get string in hex format).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm not sure that we should enable it always by default.
> >>>>>> That being said, I believe we used to have "pretty for stdout by default"
> >>>>>> behavior and I can't remember why it is gone. Though, we might
> >>>>>> think of resurrecting it.
> >>>>> You mean "pretty when stdout is a terminal"?
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, we used to do that in a lazy way, just checking if -o option is not
> >>>> specified. =)
> >>>> But your way sounds a lot better=).
> >>>>
> >>>>> That sounds ok with me,
> >>>>> all I'm trying to do is avoid having to type --pretty when I use crit
> >>>>> to inspect the images :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know this will break things, but I was hoping it might be early
> >>>>> enough in the lifetime that there weren't a lot of scripts around that
> >>>>> depend on it.
> >>>>
> >>>> To be honest, I haven't heard about none of those scripts =).
> >>>> Maybe you're right and it is still early enough indeed.
> >>>>
> >>>> But maybe the best way to solve it would be to combine both ideas described
> >>>> above.
> >>>> Add "pretty when stdout is a terminal" and add --no-pretty to force
> >>>> non-pretty
> >>>> output even for terminal.
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>> I think my #1 would be to just take this patch and break things
> >>> for people, #2 would be to do some sort of fancy detection, but I
> >>> guess this is why we have Pavel :)
> >>
> >> Would such an implementation mean piping to less could change the output
> >> format? If so, that's not a behavior I would expect or be pleased to discover.
> > 
> > Yep, agreed. I'd much rather just change the default behavior.
> 
> Yes, typing --pretty all the time is annoying :( I agree that we should make it
> ON by default for standard use-case. At the same time backward compatibility is
> important, even though the crit was announced not so long ago. And Christopher 
> is right, having crit decode versus crit decode | something producing different 
> result is also not good.
> 
> So how about introducing the "show" action that will be equal to "decode --pretty"?
> This will satisfy all the parties and will even save some more keystrokes :)

+100500

> 
> -- Pavel
> _______________________________________________
> CRIU mailing list
> CRIU at openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/criu