[CRIU] [PATCH 1/2] image: Move image definitions to own file

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:23:36PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 09:09:17PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > > 
> > > Ahem... I must admit, yes, I've not found any suitable name for that
> > > and desided to stick with some abstract "def"initions. But sure, I'll
> > > think more on that. Drop the series for a whil then.
> > 
> > Why drop? Let's come up with  better name and I'll do sed -e 's///' on patch.
> 
> Initially I thought about plain -t postfix (from 'template' word), but it
> appeared to be too much short, image-t.c, image-t.h, protobuf-t.c, protobuf-t.h.
> 
> Maybe -comm would suite better? Say image-comm.[c|h], protobuf-comm.[c|h], since
> these are common parts as for crtools itself and cpt2 tool, ie external tools.

Pavel, any consensus on this set? Is there any name you liked?