[CRIU] [PATCH 3/3] signalfd: add ability to read siginfo-s without dequeuing signals (v2)
Pavel Emelyanov
xemul at parallels.com
Tue Feb 12 09:50:03 EST 2013
>>> Process checkpointing needs to bite the bullet and
>>> create its own API instead.
>>
>> This is bad approach as well. What we should do is come up with a sane
>> API that makes sense without the checkpoint-restore project _when_ _possible_.
>
> Coming up with a sane API in general isn't easy.
That's what we've put the linux-api@ in Cc for ;)
[snip]
> Compared to this, ptrace-attaching to the process
> and then reading from /proc or issuing a new ptrace request
> looks much cleaner.
Sure it does! Also note, that it also looks much cleaner than the
fancy /proc/pid/checkpoint thing you propose.
> My opinion, of course.
Thanks,
Pavel
More information about the CRIU
mailing list