[CRIU] [PATCH 05/22] protobuf: Update core.proto for new features

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 06:10:24PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
...
> >>
> >> All tasks will have the same "cpu" value. Why not carrying
> >> the cpu_params stuff in separate image file?
> > 
> > It was _your_ (!) decision. I've been proposing to save it
> > cpu.img, but you said to keep it inside core params.
> 
> I admit it was mine. But nowadays there appeared another argument which
> in my eyes makes this thing better sit in separate image -- the information
> about _host_ abilities will be required for live migration and it has
> nothing to do with individual tasks.

OK, it's not a problem to make it living in separate image. Would
something like environment.img sounds good for you?

	Cyrill